Judgments
We aim to produce judgments containing the Tribunal’s detailed reasons and findings within seven weeks of the last day of the hearing.
Latest Judgments
Respondent: Musa Audu
Outcome: Fine
Applicant: Kevin Edwin Francis Gregory
Outcome: Revocation of S.43 Order – Refused
Applicant: Kulwant Singh Manak
Outcome: Variation of Conditions on Practising Certificate
Recent Cases
Case Number
12815/2025
Respondent: Arthur Blair Gulland
Outcome: Application Withdrawn
Case Number
12888/2026
Applicant: Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd
Outcome: Revocation of S.43 Order – Refused
Case Number
12875/2025
Respondent: Simone Elizabeth Gillian Meerabux
Outcome: Fine
Search Judgments
If you would like to check if a solicitor has had a previous Judgment against them then please search by name or case number.
FAQs
Frequently asked questions relating to SDT Judgments.
Yes. If the name of the solicitor you are interested in does not appear in our published judgments, then please contact us and a member of staff will assist you.
The SDT aims to produce judgments within seven weeks of the last day of the hearing in 85% of cases. Judgments may take longer to produce in lengthy and/or complex cases.
The Tribunal does not have power to award compensation. The Legal Ombudsman does have power to do so. Please see the Legal Ombudsman’s website for more details.
Yes, in most cases. Judgments are published on our website in accordance with our Judgment Publication Policy. This Policy sets out how long different types of Judgment will remain on the website.
Judgments which have been removed from the website in accordance with the Policy can normally be obtained from the Tribunal’s office. Please contact us and a member of staff will be happy to assist you.
In certain cases, particularly if the Tribunal has ordered that the hearing should take place in private, the Judgment may not be available to anyone other than the parties to the case without specific permission of the Tribunal.
