Skip to content

Outcome of the Review of the Tribunal’s Listing Strategy

The Tribunal’s Policy Committee met on 19 April 2022 and carefully considered the 26 questionnaire responses it had received in respect of the Tribunal’s listing strategy. 24 of these responses came from individuals and the other two from the SRA and the Law Society. The Policy Committee expressed its thanks to all those who had taken the time to respond.

The responses to the questionnaire expressed a range of views. Having taken all the views expressed into account the Policy Committee decided that with effect from 1 June 2022 the Tribunal’s listing strategy would be:

  • Case management hearings and interim applications will be listed to be heard remotely by default. Parties can apply for an in-person hearing if they want to, and applications will be considered by the Tribunal. If the parties to the case are agreed as to the type of hearing they would like this will still be determined by the Tribunal.
  • All substantive hearings  (including Restoration to the Roll etc) will be listed in person by default. Parties may apply for a remote hearing if they wish, and any such applications will be considered by the Tribunal. If the parties agree that they want a remote hearing then they will still need to make an application for this type of hearing and this will be determined by the Tribunal.
  • The Tribunal’s Guidance “Points to Note: In-Person/Hybrid and Remote Hearings at the Tribunal” will no longer be used and for first instance proceedings the Overriding Objective (Rule 4 of The Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2019 and the specific facts of the case will inform the Tribunal’s decisions as to the appropriate type of hearing.
  • Agreed Outcome applications will continue to be considered as now (which is normally on the papers with a case management hearing listed if required).

More from SDT

Insights

Faces of the Tribunal: Tracey Homewood, PA to the Legal Advisers

For this edition of Faces of the Tribunal we are pleased to introduce Tracey Homewood, PA to the Legal Advisers. Tracey supports the legal advisers … Read more


News, SDT

Statement from the President and Chief Clerk of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

We accept the High Court’s findings in SRA v Hurst and have begun a careful review of Mrs Justice Collins Rice’s observations. Ensuring that we … Read more


News

Statement from the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal on Hurst vs SRA High Court Judgment

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal acknowledges the judgment handed down by the High Court in the matter of Ashley Hurst v Solicitors Regulation … Read more